Silhouettes of two men in a club under coloured lights
Understanding  /  Gay and bisexual men

The chemsex loop: shame, apps and chillouts

One of the things I find myself doing early in the work with men struggling with chemsex is helping them name the pattern. Not the individual sessions, not the specific choices made on a particular evening, but the overall shape of how the behaviour maintains itself.

Published

One of the things I find myself doing early in the work with men struggling with chemsex is helping them name the pattern. Not the individual sessions, not the specific choices made on a particular evening, but the overall shape of how the behaviour maintains itself. Because chemsex, when it has become compulsive, is not random. It follows a loop. And once a man can see that loop clearly, the behaviour starts to feel less like something simply happening to him and more like something he can understand and, eventually, interrupt.

This piece is about that loop: the apps, the arrival, the session itself, the aftermath, and the return. It is also about the emotional logic underneath each stage, because without that the loop looks like a series of bad choices rather than what it actually is: a coherent, if deeply costly, response to a set of unmet needs.

The apps

For most men, the chemsex loop begins in the same place: a phone, an app, most often Grindr. The time is usually late evening. Often the man is alone, and the aloneness is not neutral. It carries a particular quality of discomfort, a low-grade restlessness or sadness, that he may not be able to name precisely but that he has learned the app reliably lifts.

The search is not random. Profile descriptions reference specific substances. Phrases like PnP, T, or party and play signal chemsex availability. The man opening the app at eleven on a Friday night may tell himself he is just scrolling, that he has not decided anything yet. But the pattern has its own momentum. The decision has often been made before the phone was picked up.

This is one of the most important observations I make in this work: the point at which a man can still intervene in the loop is much earlier than the point at which he usually becomes aware it has started. By the time he is exchanging messages with someone advertising drugs and sex, the drive side of us is already strongly activated, the alarm inside us is already quieted by the anticipatory relief of what is coming, and the capacity for values-based reflection has largely gone offline. He has not made a series of conscious bad decisions. He has followed a pattern that runs faster than his conscious thinking.

The arrival

The journey to a session is a moment of transition. Some men describe a flash of clarity in that interval, a moment of thinking: what am I doing? A few turn back. Most do not, because by this point the anticipation has its own strong emotional logic, and turning back means returning to the state that made the phone come out in the first place.

The arrival at a chillout is often described in terms I find striking. The warmth of the greeting. The ease. The sense, almost immediate, of being in a space where nothing that happens tonight will be judged. For men who spend much of their daily life managing how they are perceived, that ease is not trivial. It is part of what they are there for, and it is real, even if it is partly pharmacologically produced.

The session

Sessions almost always last much longer than the man anticipated when he set out. This is partly pharmacological: crystal methamphetamine and mephedrone substantially alter the experience of time, suppress the need for sleep, and maintain arousal over extended periods in a way that makes stopping at 2 AM feel less relevant than it otherwise would. It is also social: there is a powerful pull to maintain the connection and sense of belonging the session has produced, and leaving means re-entering a world where those things are not available.

The longer the session runs, the larger the physical and psychological toll. Sleep deprivation accumulates. The neurological load of the substances increases. What began as something chosen becomes something sustained by momentum and pharmacology more than by ongoing decision.

The aftermath

The aftermath of a chemsex session is, in my experience, the most clinically significant part of the loop and the part least discussed in the general conversation about chemsex.

What happens after is, for many men, devastating. The physical comedown from crystal methamphetamine is severe and prolonged: exhaustion, flat mood, anxiety, sometimes paranoia, effects that can last several days. The period sometimes called Suicide Tuesday in the chemsex community, referring to the deepest point of the methamphetamine comedown, is real and is a genuine crisis risk.

The psychological aftermath follows a recognisable pattern. The behaviour that answered the loneliness or the threat of the night before now becomes the source of a new and heavier shame. The things that happened during the session run through his mind in a way that feels critical and punishing. He may have had sex with people whose names he does not know, taken risks he would not have taken sober, done things that trouble him in the clarity of the comedown. The shame is not vague. It is often a precise and specific attack on his sense of himself as a person.

That shame matters because of what it drives. The alarm inside us, now activated by shame and self-criticism, needs to be quietened. And the man has learned, reliably, that the behaviour which produces the shame is also the behaviour that most effectively quietens the threat. So the loop returns to its beginning. The app comes out. Not to replicate the pleasure of the session that just ended, but to escape the pain of the comedown from it.

Shame drives the behaviour. The behaviour drives shame.

This is the self-fulfilling loop in its most concrete form. Shame drives the behaviour. The behaviour drives shame. The man cannot easily see a route out because the only tool he has that reliably manages the emotional state that makes him want to use is the use itself.

The escalation over time

Across weeks, months and years, the loop tends to produce escalation. Sessions become more frequent. Doses increase as tolerance builds. For some men, the type of drug use shifts, including toward injecting, which is covered in Slamming and injecting in chemsex: when to seek help.

The social world narrows. Men who were embedded in a life outside chemsex find friendships and interests gradually squeezed out. The comedowns take the time that would have gone to other things. The social network contracts to people within the chemsex scene, which makes the scene harder to leave because there is nowhere else to go for connection.

The sexual dimension escalates along the same logic. Experiences that produced intense pleasure early require more over time to produce the same effect. The pull is toward something more intense or more extreme to replicate the original feeling.

What chillouts are actually doing

If you ask men to be completely honest, many of them will say that the sex at a chillout is not always the most compelling part of the evening. What draws them back, apart from the drugs and easy access often to this, is the community. The conversations. The sense of being among men who understand something about their experience.

The belonging produced in a chemsex space is real but fragile.

The difficulty is that the belonging produced in a chemsex space is real but fragile. It is real because the connections are felt and the sense of ease and acceptance is not entirely an artefact of the substances. But it is fragile because it cannot hold outside the conditions that produced it. Attempts to extend those connections into ordinary life usually fail, leaving the man feeling more alone in the aftermath than he did before. Which means he goes back.

Breaking the loop

The work of breaking the loop is not simply about stopping the behaviour. If it were that simple, men would have stopped. They can see the harm. Many of the men I work with can map the pattern in clinical-level detail. But knowing about a loop and being able to interrupt it are very different things.

What interrupts the loop is building alternative resources for the things the loop has been providing: reducing the power of the threat state that makes the app come out in the first place, and beginning, slowly, to build forms of connection with other men that can exist outside a chemsex context.

In the groups we run, men begin to have conversations about themselves with other men in a space that does not require substances or sex. The group is, in a very literal sense, the first test of whether connection without those things is possible. For many of the men I work with, it is the first experience of that kind they have had in a long time.

More on what that process looks like is in our main guide, Chemsex: what it is and how to recover, and for men thinking about whether the programme is right for them, the application page has the relevant details. The physical consequences of the loop are addressed in Physical risks of chemsex: STIs, overdose and the hidden harm.

If this essay describes something you recognise, this is what the programme was built for.

A six-month group therapy programme for men whose sex lives have started to feel out of control. Available across the UK.

See how the programme works